Why Kororaa is (now) derived from Fedora

You might be wondering why I chose to derive Kororaa from Fedora. Perhaps you have used Fedora in the past yourself and been burnt, or perhaps (like I used to) you can’t stand Yum, Fedora’s package manager. Perhaps you even hate RPMs?

Well let me say, I understand!

Let me also say, that I think you should give Fedora another chance (like I did), or at least continue reading this post :-)

All distros are different and they have different goals. However, I’m drawn to Fedora for several reasons including the fact that at its heart, Fedora is about building a community of contributors, not just consumers.

Relationship with Red Hat
Fedora is a community operating system, whose major commercial sponsor is Red Hat. Many Red Hat engineers work on free software projects (see Upstream below) and Fedora provides a platform to push those changes to a large audience. While there is a small team of Red Hat engineers dedicated to working on Fedora, it remains primarily a community driven project.

Values
Fedora has a great set of values, which embody the very heart of the community; Freedom, Friends, Features, First. A central goal for Fedora is advancing free software and content freedom.

In particular, I admire Fedora’s strong support of freedom. This means that they do not ship (nor support) proprietary software, but naturally prefer (and create where necessary) free software alternatives. For example, instead of building tools to help install NVIDIA drivers Fedora invested in Nouveau, the free 3D driver for NVIDIA cards. This not only keeps Fedora free to re-distribute, but it benefits the whole Linux community. That’s extremely admirable, in my opinion.

That’s not to say that you can’t get the NVIDIA drivers, or other proprietary software for your system. Various third party repositories, such as RPMFusion, exist for this very purpose (and of course, Kororaa configures all this for you out of the box!).

Package Management
Yum (and RPM) have made leaps and bounds over the last few years and I actually quite enjoy using it now (and it’s quite fast!). Having said that, most package commands are run through PackageKit these days. As for RPMs themselves, they’re just a binary package format like Debs – it’s the package manager that makes the difference.

Download an RPM from the net and you can install it with Yum (or via the GUI using PackageKit), which will automatically pull in any dependencies for you. You rarely use the rpm command, like in Debian and Ubuntu you rarely use dpkg.

Security updates
Yum has a very handy feature, namely the ability to list and install only security related updates. It’s as simple as:
yum --security update

If that wasn’t useful enough, you can also install an update which fixes a specific bug. You can get a list of all updates and their bugzilla numbers with:
yum list-sec bugzillas

Now, once you have the update to fix that specific bug, you can install it using the bugzilla number from the list above.
yum --bz 650995 update

You can also combine the security option with bugzilla:
yum --security list-sec bugzillas

How powerful is that?!

Groups
Fedora also has a wonderful addition, called groups. After some educational software, office programs, or support for your language? It’s easy, just install the group you need, like so:
yum groupinstall "Educational Software"

If you’re a developer, getting started with Fedora is easy. Just install the development group you need, such as GNOME, KDE, Java, Kernel, Perl, or even the Web.
yum groupinstall "Development Tools"

There are almost 200 groups, ready to make your life easier!

Community repos
Fedora also has several contributor repositories available for end users. This is sort-of similar to Ubuntu’s PPA (Personal Package Archive). However, Fedora often provides updates for major packages, so you don’t actually need to add a separate repository to get the latest version of things like KDE.

Apt fall-back
If that’s still not enough, you can also install Debian’s Apt package manager and other graphical front-ends like Synaptic in Fedora!

Updates
Similar to other non-rolling release distros, Fedora generally only applies bug fixes to a stable release, rather than introducing new features with later versions.

Having said that, Fedora does often provide major updates to some specific programs, including KDE. In general, I have found that often packages like Firefox, OpenOffice.org and the Linux kernel itself get major updates. So, with Fedora you are not left behind quite as much, nor having to add repositories for unofficial builds. I like that :-)

Innovation
With every new release, Fedora is often leading the charge to implement new free software technologies. In fact, Fedora’s primary sponsor Red Hat is responsible for some of the greatest desktop enhancements ever, including AIGLX (Accelerated Indirect GLX), D-Bus, DeviceKit, HAL, NetworkManager, Ogg Theora, and PolicyKit. Even the Wayland display server (which Ubuntu has announced they are moving to) was started by Kristian Høgsberg when he was working for Red Hat (he’s now at Intel).

Not to mention that out of all the vendors, Red Hat contributes the most to the Linux kernel and to X.Org. Red Hat is also the biggest contributor to GNOME (including GNOME Shell) and they also provides infrastructure, hosting and bandwidth for the project.

Kudos.

Upstream
Fedora works as closely to upstream as possible. They don’t go off on their own tangent with disregard for upstream projects. If they want to have something changed, they work with upstream to create fixes and introduce new features.

Take the Chromium web browser for example. It’s not included in Fedora for several reasons, but Fedora people are working with Google to fix these issues, so that it can be included nicely. By doing this, other distros will benefit!

Having said that, there are Chromuim builds available too. Just add the repository and away you go!

Security
I used to wonder at the usefulness of SELinux (Security Enhanced Linux). Afterall, this is Linux right? It’s secure enough.

That might be true, but SELinux is still extremely useful (and even Debian is now implementing SELinux).

SELinux works by protecting your system, even if there is an exploit available in an application which gives users root access. Take Apache for example. In a non-SELinux enabled system, if a user gains root through an exploit in Apache they will have full access to your machine. Not so with SELinux. Even if someone gains root access, there are rules around what Apache can and can’t do. For example, these might be restricting it to only read the directory which holds websites. Your system is compromised, but the damage is limited.

SELinux is not just useful for servers. It’s also valuable to your desktop system, especially if you use Adobe’s proprietary flash player (which is known to have lots of security holes). When Fedora first implemented SELinux, there were lots of issues because it would block the system from doing what was considered normal tasks. These growing pains are now over, and SELinux rarely gets in the way. Even if it does, the graphical tool which pops up will tell you how to change that particular behaviour (if you really want to).

Of course, at the end of the day you can still turn SELinux off (or just to warning mode). Kororaa leaves it enabled, as it’s a great way to add extra security to your system, especially as a major part of our lives are now lived on the Internet.

Tools
Fedora comes with lots of handy graphical tools to help you manage your system, including

  • firewall
  • language settings
  • network shares
  • services
  • users
  • web server

And many more..

Reliability
In the last few years I’ve been solely using Fedora and I have been super impressed with its reliability. Things just work, as you would expect them to. No weirdness. Even though Fedora provides major updates to many packages, it’s still more reliable than other popular distributions I’ve used. Perhaps this is due to sticking close to upstream.

Summary
Fedora is truly a great, free operating system. Its core principles are ones that I fully support, but which I recognise might restrict or turn off some users. This is why I chose to re-launch Kororaa as I have, so that users don’t give up on Fedora (and Linux) before they have a chance to love it. I see great potential in Fedora, and great benefit to those who are using it.

Thanks to their wonderful build tools like livecd-creator, I am able to build a powerful operating system that includes all those tweaks and extras that users want.

Now, why not give Kororaa a shot? :-)

7 Responses to “Why Kororaa is (now) derived from Fedora”


  • Thanks Chris,
    I’m completely agree with this article, with some little exceptions.
    Fedora can be a good base for an “out of the box” distro for the reasons you have mentioned.
    I used fedora for an year before to switch to Sabayon.
    I used and recommend for the non-expert user only “out of the box” distributions. Mint kde (for kubuntu), Mepis (debian), Sabayon (Gentoo), Chakra (Arch)… but no fedora based.
    Now this void place is filled with your Kororaa.

    What is your plan for release update? I love Sabayon because it is a rolling release. How much time you need to release a stable after a fedora release? What do you think to do when fedora stop to support a release? I think ~6 months release period is too often for a “over constructed” distro like Mint or Kororaa.

    Kudos to you!

  • I plan to just make a new release every time there is a new Fedora out and then make changes/fixes with subsequent releases of that version, like 14.1, etc. However, as I’m just getting it off the ground, I’m releasing betas of the already stable Fedora 14 release. Once I do that, I plan to start with some 15 betas so that I can get ready for when 15 is out. That’s the plan, we’ll see how it goes ;-) I had thought to run Kororaa at one release behind (so 13 now, 14 once 15 is released) for stability reasons, but I haven’t decided on that yet..

    -c

  • Oh, and please give it a try at some point and let me know how it goes ;-)

    -c

  • Very nice job!

    You should update wikipedia too to get the good news out

  • I don’t like to edit my own stuff, so maybe someone like you could ;-)

    -c

  • Try remastering it instead of creating yet another useless derivative (no offense) thing is when dealing with fedora in general your bound by their policy. Nothing more than taking an existing OS throwing in some packages but that’s it, you still need to retain their censorship as in logos. With a remastery at least you can do what you want with it aside from including their branding and official fedora repos. You also don’t need to keep up with fedora’s release cycle just to be up to date, you can use thousands of repos out there in the wild including Debian’s in order to pool together the latest updates.

  • Hey Meh,

    I’m not sure what you mean by remastering it – as in create a brand new distro from scratch, or one that is based on all of them out there? I’m just one guy, so no way I can do all of that and still release a stable distro :-) I don’t need Fedora’s logos or artwork anyway, and I can put whatever I want in the distro, so I’m not bound by anything. If I want the latest X package, I can package it. Also, I like Fedora, so this is really a Fedora with lots of extras that non-Fedora experts can use :-)

    Cheers,
    Chris

Leave a Reply