<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for the blog of Chris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.christophersmart.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.christophersmart.com</link>
	<description>Fortiter Et Recte</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:43:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Linux still &#8217;sucks&#8217; by qian</title>
		<link>http://blog.christophersmart.com/2010/03/09/why-linux-still-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-6490</link>
		<dc:creator>qian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christophersmart.com/?p=2135#comment-6490</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Should we be focusing on gaining market share and making everything work for Windows users, or just sticking to making great free software for us?

Drink!

&gt;&gt;Do we care that proprietary vendor lock-in devices like iPod don’t work seamlessly?

Feck!

&gt;&gt;Should we be putting effort in to making them work?

Arse!

&gt;&gt;So, should we be making Linux more like Windows to gain more market share? 

Girls!

&gt;&gt;Or keep Linux unique and special?

That would be an ecumenical matter!

HTH, qian :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Should we be focusing on gaining market share and making everything work for Windows users, or just sticking to making great free software for us?</p>
<p>Drink!</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;Do we care that proprietary vendor lock-in devices like iPod don’t work seamlessly?</p>
<p>Feck!</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;Should we be putting effort in to making them work?</p>
<p>Arse!</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;So, should we be making Linux more like Windows to gain more market share? </p>
<p>Girls!</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;Or keep Linux unique and special?</p>
<p>That would be an ecumenical matter!</p>
<p>HTH, qian <img src='http://blog.christophersmart.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Linux still &#8217;sucks&#8217; by tthu</title>
		<link>http://blog.christophersmart.com/2010/03/09/why-linux-still-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-6487</link>
		<dc:creator>tthu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 07:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christophersmart.com/?p=2135#comment-6487</guid>
		<description>Are those two things really mutually exlusive? Isn&#039;t linux supposed to do be able to do both of those if the community or even an individual so desires?

From an outsiders perspective it would appear that a distro like Ubuntu is aiming to achieve the first goal, whereas any number of other distros are more firmly focused on the second, perhaps even shunning the first.

It sounds like the people you describe who don&#039;t &quot;get it&quot;, aren&#039;t really computer people, and perhaps they never will be.

I read something interesting recently about the tech service/support industry and getting people to report error messages correctly. The writer put forward the idea that these days pretty much everyone is required to use a computer at work, even though a lot of them may not like using it, may not want to and don&#039;t actually know how to use it well. The writer said that *most* people who use computers develop a filter in their brain to remove all the unnecessary noise/data that is threatening to overwhelm them and focus in on a specific set of tasks.

An example he gave was that when we first learn to drive, there is an incredible amount of information to process and it freaks you out. Over time your brain begins to filter out everything except what you need to see to be able to drive according to the road rules.

In the same way, people who are using computers learn to do a set of actions to produce the result they desire, filtering everything else out. They don&#039;t care how things work, they don&#039;t particularly want to learn new things and find out &#039;why&#039;. If anything happens outside that set of &#039;action, action=&gt;result&#039;, they panic and don&#039;t know what to do.

For most of these people - who I view as &#039;Average Joe Windows&#039; - that the linux debate seems to be about, linux is way too far outside their comfort zone and probably will be until MS is no longer the default option.

Personally, I think linux is something for people who enjoy technology, who like computers, and/or who like to learn.

Also, as I&#039;ve been looking a lot into the ebook/ereader industry lately, there are some shocking figures about the current literacy rate of people and the amount of books people read a year.

It seems most people these days just don&#039;t want to learn anything new that isn&#039;t handed up to them in a passive manner (TV).

This comic really hits home about the mindset of the general public.
http://www.recombinantrecords.net/docs/2009-05-Amusing-Ourselves-to-Death.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are those two things really mutually exlusive? Isn&#8217;t linux supposed to do be able to do both of those if the community or even an individual so desires?</p>
<p>From an outsiders perspective it would appear that a distro like Ubuntu is aiming to achieve the first goal, whereas any number of other distros are more firmly focused on the second, perhaps even shunning the first.</p>
<p>It sounds like the people you describe who don&#8217;t &#8220;get it&#8221;, aren&#8217;t really computer people, and perhaps they never will be.</p>
<p>I read something interesting recently about the tech service/support industry and getting people to report error messages correctly. The writer put forward the idea that these days pretty much everyone is required to use a computer at work, even though a lot of them may not like using it, may not want to and don&#8217;t actually know how to use it well. The writer said that *most* people who use computers develop a filter in their brain to remove all the unnecessary noise/data that is threatening to overwhelm them and focus in on a specific set of tasks.</p>
<p>An example he gave was that when we first learn to drive, there is an incredible amount of information to process and it freaks you out. Over time your brain begins to filter out everything except what you need to see to be able to drive according to the road rules.</p>
<p>In the same way, people who are using computers learn to do a set of actions to produce the result they desire, filtering everything else out. They don&#8217;t care how things work, they don&#8217;t particularly want to learn new things and find out &#8216;why&#8217;. If anything happens outside that set of &#8216;action, action=&gt;result&#8217;, they panic and don&#8217;t know what to do.</p>
<p>For most of these people &#8211; who I view as &#8216;Average Joe Windows&#8217; &#8211; that the linux debate seems to be about, linux is way too far outside their comfort zone and probably will be until MS is no longer the default option.</p>
<p>Personally, I think linux is something for people who enjoy technology, who like computers, and/or who like to learn.</p>
<p>Also, as I&#8217;ve been looking a lot into the ebook/ereader industry lately, there are some shocking figures about the current literacy rate of people and the amount of books people read a year.</p>
<p>It seems most people these days just don&#8217;t want to learn anything new that isn&#8217;t handed up to them in a passive manner (TV).</p>
<p>This comic really hits home about the mindset of the general public.<br />
<a href="http://www.recombinantrecords.net/docs/2009-05-Amusing-Ourselves-to-Death.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.recombinantrecords.net/docs/2009-05-Amusing-Ourselves-to-Death.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do you use H.264 or MPEG? You need a license. by Flash Video basics &#124; Motion Graphics and the User Experience</title>
		<link>http://blog.christophersmart.com/2010/02/04/do-you-use-h-264-or-mpeg-you-need-a-license/comment-page-1/#comment-6485</link>
		<dc:creator>Flash Video basics &#124; Motion Graphics and the User Experience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christophersmart.com/?p=2068#comment-6485</guid>
		<description>[...] (and opinions) but the most flexible is the h.264 codec. there is some question about future liability issues The main reason is users can view this file type with out the flash player, power to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (and opinions) but the most flexible is the h.264 codec. there is some question about future liability issues The main reason is users can view this file type with out the flash player, power to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cheaper SSDs on the way thanks to new 25nm process by Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.christophersmart.com/2010/02/02/cheaper-ssds-on-the-way-thanks-to-new-25nm-process/comment-page-1/#comment-6482</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christophersmart.com/?p=2056#comment-6482</guid>
		<description>Oh.. thanks for that link. So it looks like we still have to backup, zero, restore every now and then to maintain speed of the SSDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh.. thanks for that link. So it looks like we still have to backup, zero, restore every now and then to maintain speed of the SSDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cheaper SSDs on the way thanks to new 25nm process by Chris Samuel</title>
		<link>http://blog.christophersmart.com/2010/02/02/cheaper-ssds-on-the-way-thanks-to-new-25nm-process/comment-page-1/#comment-6481</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christophersmart.com/?p=2056#comment-6481</guid>
		<description>I suspect TRIM won&#039;t help that much - it&#039;s not a queueable command and so is pretty suboptimal, especially as some SSD&#039;s can take hundreds of milliseconds to process it.. :-(

For more info see the excellent LWN article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://lwn.net/Articles/347511/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;The trouble with discard&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect TRIM won&#8217;t help that much &#8211; it&#8217;s not a queueable command and so is pretty suboptimal, especially as some SSD&#8217;s can take hundreds of milliseconds to process it.. <img src='http://blog.christophersmart.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>For more info see the excellent LWN article on <a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/347511/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;The trouble with discard&#8221;</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linux on an Apple Xserve EFI only machine by lid</title>
		<link>http://blog.christophersmart.com/2009/07/23/linux-on-an-apple-xserve-efi-only-machine/comment-page-2/#comment-6478</link>
		<dc:creator>lid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christophersmart.com/?p=1005#comment-6478</guid>
		<description>In case anyone&#039;s wondering, Ubuntu 10.04 alpha3 (Lusty Lynx) is not currently working... it hangs at grub2 after loading initrd.img. You can still boot it by reverting to the 9.10 kernel (2.6.31-19-generic).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case anyone&#8217;s wondering, Ubuntu 10.04 alpha3 (Lusty Lynx) is not currently working&#8230; it hangs at grub2 after loading initrd.img. You can still boot it by reverting to the 9.10 kernel (2.6.31-19-generic).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to triple boot Mac Pro with OS X, Fedora, Windows by Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.christophersmart.com/2009/12/02/how-to-triple-boot-mac-pro-with-os-x-fedora-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-6468</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christophersmart.com/?p=1607#comment-6468</guid>
		<description>Hey Ali,

Something like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.derekhildreth.com/blog/fedora-11-leonidas-on-macbook-aluminum-51-guide#Backlight&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this howto&lt;/a&gt; might help.

-c</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ali,</p>
<p>Something like <a href="http://www.derekhildreth.com/blog/fedora-11-leonidas-on-macbook-aluminum-51-guide#Backlight" rel="nofollow">this howto</a> might help.</p>
<p>-c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to triple boot Mac Pro with OS X, Fedora, Windows by Ali</title>
		<link>http://blog.christophersmart.com/2009/12/02/how-to-triple-boot-mac-pro-with-os-x-fedora-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-6467</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christophersmart.com/?p=1607#comment-6467</guid>
		<description>Thank you Chris

I did it with fedora 12 and now I have 3 OS installed on my macbook.
how about wireless and brightness keys drivers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Chris</p>
<p>I did it with fedora 12 and now I have 3 OS installed on my macbook.<br />
how about wireless and brightness keys drivers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NetworkManager 0.8 to arrive shortly by Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.christophersmart.com/2010/02/20/networkmanager-0-8-to-arrive-shortly/comment-page-1/#comment-6465</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christophersmart.com/?p=2125#comment-6465</guid>
		<description>Hi Jay,

There&#039;s the usual Linux tools like ifconfig and iwconfig (as well as wpa_supplicant, if you have it), which you can use once you stop the NetworkManager daemon. Other than that I&#039;m not sure, but you might want to check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://vidner.net/martin/software/cnetworkmanager/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cnetworkmanager&lt;/a&gt;, the command line interface for NetworkManager.

-c</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jay,</p>
<p>There&#8217;s the usual Linux tools like ifconfig and iwconfig (as well as wpa_supplicant, if you have it), which you can use once you stop the NetworkManager daemon. Other than that I&#8217;m not sure, but you might want to check out <a href="http://vidner.net/martin/software/cnetworkmanager/" rel="nofollow">cnetworkmanager</a>, the command line interface for NetworkManager.</p>
<p>-c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NetworkManager 0.8 to arrive shortly by JayLinux</title>
		<link>http://blog.christophersmart.com/2010/02/20/networkmanager-0-8-to-arrive-shortly/comment-page-1/#comment-6464</link>
		<dc:creator>JayLinux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christophersmart.com/?p=2125#comment-6464</guid>
		<description>There is a NetworkManager applet in the top panel of GNOME (2.28) in Fedora 12.

What is the command-line equivalent to Network Manager applet, in case I want to start wlan0 (Wireless Network) or eth0 (wired) from cmd-line/virtual terminal.

Thanks,

Jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a NetworkManager applet in the top panel of GNOME (2.28) in Fedora 12.</p>
<p>What is the command-line equivalent to Network Manager applet, in case I want to start wlan0 (Wireless Network) or eth0 (wired) from cmd-line/virtual terminal.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
